I think I'd be a smart-ass and be a Realist. What are you?
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
«The Philosophical Glass of Water»
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Label Cloud
About Me
Alaska
Animals
Anonymous
Art
Atheism
Bicycle
Blog Reactions
Blog Upgrades
Blogger
Blunt Honesty
Buildings
Caturday
Clothing
Code
Comics
Computers
Copyright
Cruise Ship Watch
Death
Desktop Backgrounds
Disasters
Doomsday
Economy
eMail
Emergency
Energy
Flying Spaghetti Monster
Food
Free Speech
Friends
Games
Gay Rights
Google
Goth
Holidays
Idaho
Idle Mind
Illness
Injury
Internet
Japan
Jury Duty
Ketchikan
Large Hadron Collider
Lasers
Law
Lies
Magic: the Gathering
Master Marf
Meme
Milestones
Money
Motivational Monday
Mountain
Mountain Dew
Music
Musical Taste
Photos
Poems
Politics
Polls
Pony
Power Outage
Problems
PSAs
Random
Reader Opinion
Reader Submission
Relationships
Religion
Scam
Science
Science Fiction
Scientology
Screenshots
Sea-Monkeys
Ships
Sims 3 Legacy
Social Norms
Software
South Park
Space
Stupidity
Technology
The Game
Tourism
Trail
Unusual Ads
Vacation
Weapons
Weather
Web Feeds
Word Play
Work
YouTube
The "smart-ass" point of view wasn't on there?
ReplyDeleteOther points of view -
Union: "This glass was made by exploiting child labor in Canada."
LGBT: "Obviously the glass won't find an opposite sex partner."
Goreite: "Fossil fuels were used to make this glass that released green house glasses which threaten the existence of man-(and woman-)kind."
Limbaughism: "If the government would quit screwing up the markets, we would have a high-quality crystal glass for the price of cheap plastic junk."
My point of view changes day by day, but usually it is this:
"I am thankful that God gave me a glass with clean Sierra water delivered via the Hetch Hetchy aqueduct system."
@ Looney: What I meant was the Realist point of view seemed like a smart-ass response.
ReplyDeleteI was debating whether or not to even say anything, but did God build the aqueduct?
@Marf, ok, now I understand!
ReplyDeleteOf course Christians view God as the ultimate cause of everything, so - in a similar manner - perhaps an atheist would give thanks to the Big Bang? The difference being that Christians believe God created the laws of physics, which the designers of the aqueduct were then able to use, whereas the Big Bang was only subject to the laws of physics.
@ Looney: Perhaps an atheist would give thanks to the big bang if he/she believed in a deterministic universe, where everything that has or ever will happen was predefined at the time of the big bang.
ReplyDeleteI however, think there is an element of pure randomness that shapes the universe at a quantum level. Nothing is absolute. It would explain why matter is not spread perfectly even as it should have been by the big bang.
I love how a discussion about a philosophical glass of water turns into one about the origin of the universe. And in no more than 4 comments at that.
And fuel for the never ending war of religion versus science is added to the fire :D
ReplyDeleteBut me being atheist, im gunna have to side with marf on this one lol
- Six Legions